#13 The 2nd complaint from Attorney Wotczech Tomczek

I went to my attorney the following Monday for a meeting. They were insisting at that time to file a complaint based upon the previous Friday's meeting with Zaremba and about the documents that had been submitted.
Now, this document may seem pretty reasonable, but I demanded that it not be sent for the following reasons:
1. I had been held from May 15th to August 30th and I wanted desperately to get back to Belarus.
2. My attorney’s DID NOT TRANSLATE THIS DOCUMENT FOR ME; NOT DID THEY TELL ME THE CONTENT OR LET ME READ IT BEFORE IT WAS SENT.
3. They had not told me that Zaremba would be at that meeting, so I had no chance to prepare and questions ahead of time and
4. My representative at that meeting did not want me to hear the contents of the report which showed the damages nor did he in any way protest what Zaremba was doing or ask even a single hard question.
5. At the Monday meeting in which they said they wanted to send this document, they were screaming at me that I was guilty and that this would go better on me.
6. And finally, because the last time that the lawyer complained, all that happened was that the prosecutor made me stay longer in Poland.
So, I told them not to complain unless they heard from me. They sent the complaint anyway. I told everybody from the embassy, to my lawyer to the prosecutor that I had not agreed to any complaint. the responce though turned out to be moot; the prosecutor decided to reject the complaint anyway and filed a motion for trial. His doing this was also hidden by my own attorneys, for over a month, thank you very much.
Complaint
6 September, 2002
The exact value of the things that have been fixed needs to be made more complete.
Twardowski is to be a witness.
The bike was not damaged, and the police agree to this.
We want for Goodman to make another testimony.
All of the information needs to be given to Mr. Goodman in this case.
The reasons for this are that the experts made all of the costs of fixing the car including damages that could not be caused by Goodman.
This included the rear door and the front mask.
The monies charged to Mr. Goodman should be less.
Twardowski should be a witness because he could say something of a decision by the experts about the bike and that the decision of the experts is missing.
And I want Mr. Goodman to make another testimony because we want Mr. Goodman to tell the story again on the same day that they put the courts final documents together, and because of this, all of the information could not be known by Mr. Goodman.